User talk:24.69.247.192

First off, I'd just like to say "please cool down." There's no reason to go around calling people idiots. If you're trying to make us see things from your view point, you're doing a poor job so far.

I'll quickly answer the two issues you brought up with your edits. First, miracles cannot be disproven scientifically using the scientific method. Hopefully you knew that already (or you don't have a clue what you're talking about), and you were simply reffering to fact that scientists have recognized that there are "laws" in place that govern the properties of physical matter (i.e., the sun never rises in the west). However, that doesn't stop miracles from existing either. In fact, that's necessary for mircales to occur. After all, it's precisely because the sun always rises in the east that it would be a "miracle" if for one day it rose in the west. We need the set laws, otherwise we couldn't have miracles to begin with. I suggest you read C.S. Lewis' book Miracles for more on that subject. If you really do have an open mind, of course, and don't just accept atheism for granted like you accuse us of doing with Christianity.

Second, it wasn't one person who received revelations from God in the Bible (unlike Islam, where only Mohammed wrote the Koran). Many, many people have contributed to the Bible. Jesus disn't select one disciple, but twelve. Four of which wrote the Gospels, which are four books written at different time periods by four different people, but that tell the same story (with slight variations, which has to be expected of course - if they were all exactly the same, then that would actually encourage people to think them false).

God bless, and please do more research. God loves you and wants you to throw away the sin which seperates you from Him. -- P.B. Pilhet / Talk 16:58, 23 May 2008 (UTC)